Temporomandibular joint using the Bite Turbos appliance. It´s important to realize a case - control trial that evaluated those possible effects.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
The purpose of this review is identify the possible diagnostics methods of the Temporomandibular Joint that can determine the behavior of itself when oclusal changes occur. In addition, the secondary objective are know relevant information about occlusion, Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ), bite turbos and contemporaneous diagnostics methods for the TMJ and near structures. A literature reviewed with a total background of 44 articles. Those articles include concepts of functional occlusion, Temporomandibular joint development and the importance on the patient’s occlusion pattern, also the Bite Turbos as an important mechanism to help the orthodontic treatment, and finally the reports that supports diagnostics methods to evaluate de Temporomandibular complex like the Cone-Beam Computer Tomography as a vanguard method. We concluded that the Cone Beam CT was an excellent method to evaluate the Temporomandibular complex, and has a great relationship between riskbenefits. In addition, we conclude that there were insufficient information about the possible effects on the Temporomandibular joint using the Bite Turbos appliance. It´s important to realize a case control trial that evaluated those possible effects.
Key words: Orthodontics, disarticulation, cone-beam computed tomography, temporomandibular joint, dental occlusion.
Herrera, S., & Puerta, G. (2013). Temporomandibular joint using the Bite Turbos appliance. It´s important to realize a case - control trial that evaluated those possible effects. Revista Estomatología, 21(2), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.25100/re.v21i2.5764
1. Mejia CA, Salazar L. Desarrollo ontogénico de la articulación temporomandibular durante el periodo fetal .
Revista Estomatológica 1996 6:1-72.
2. Friedman M H, Weisberg J. Application of Orthopedic Principles in Evaluation of the Temporomandibular Joint. 1982; 62 (5):597-603.
3. Hidaka O, Adachi S, Takada K. The Difference in Condylar Position Between Centric Relation and Centric Occlusion in Pretreatment Japanese Orthodontic Patients. Angle Orthod 2002;72: 295–301.
4. Friedman MH, Weisberg J. Application of Orthopedic Principles in Evaluation of the Temporomandibular Joint. J. Physic Therapy. 1982; 62:59.
5. Possult U: Physiology of Occlusion and Rehabilitation. Oxford, England, Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1969: 12.
6. Wang L, Lazebnik M, Detamore S. Hyaline cartilage cells outperform mandibular condylar cartilage cells in a TMJ fibrocartilage tissue engineering application. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2009; 17:346-53.
7. McNamara J, Seligman D, Okeson J. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment and Temporomandibular Disorders: A
review. J Orofacial Pain 1995; 9:73-90.
8. Watted N, Witt E, Kenn W. The temporomandibular joint and the disck condyle relationship after functional orthopaedic treatment: a magnetic resonance imaging study Eur J Orthod 2001; 23(6):683-93.
9. Rinchuse D, Kandasamy S. Articulators in orthodontics: An evidence-based perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129:299-308.
10. Tsuruta A et Al. The relationship between morphological changes of the condyle and condilar position in the glenoid fossa. J Orofacial Pain 2004; 18:148-55.
11. Hickman D, Cramer R. The effect of different condylar positions on masticatory muscle electromyographic activity in humans. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85:18-23.
12. Kozlowski J. Honing Damon System Mechanics for the Ultimate in Efficiency and Excellence. Clinical Impressions. 2008; 16(1):23-8.
13. Thomas, B. Comunicación personal. Damon System certified education Staff.Poway CA Septiembre 26 de 2008.
14. Rodríguez A, Castaño AM, Puerta E. Variación en la posición condilar con el uso de Bite Turbos®. Estudio piloto. [Tesis Especialización] Universidad del Valle, Escuela de Odontología; 2011.
15. Iscan Hakan N, Sarisoy Lale. Comparison of the effects of passive posterior biteblocks with different construction bites on the craniofacial and dentoalveolar structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112:171-8.
16. Michelotti A, Iodice G. The role of orthodontics in temporomandibular disorders. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2010; 37:411-29.
17. Conti A et al. Relationship Between Signs and Symptoms of Temporomandibular Disorders and Orthodontic Treatment: A Cross-sectional Study. Angle Orthod 2003; 73:411-7.
18. Karl P, Foley T. The use of a deprogramming appliance to obtain centric relation records. Angle Orthod 1999; 69 (2):117-25.
19. Llombart D, Llombart JA. Aplicaciones del análisis estructural al estudio de las interferencias oclusales. Revista internacional de métodos numéricos, 1996; 12(4):497-513.
20. Klar N, Kulbersh R, Freeland T, Kaczynski R. Maximum Intercuspation-Centric Relation Disharmony in 200 Consecutively Finished Cases in a Gnathologlcally Oriented Practice. Semin Orthod 2003; 9: 109-16.
21. Massaiu G, Vargiu A, Lorenzini V. Un nuovo approccio in terapia gnatologica. La terapia mediante byte invisible. Il Corriere Ortodontico 2010; 4:31-45.
22. Rinchuse D, Kandasamy S. Myths of orthodontic gnathology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:322-30.
23. Roth RH. Functional Occlusion for the Orthodontist PART 1. J Clin Orthod 1981; (1):32-51.
24. Murray G. The Lateral Pterygoid Muscle. Semin Orthod. 2012; 18:44-50.
25. Koul R. Orthodontic Implications of Growth and Differently Enabled Mandibul a r Movement s for the Temporomandibular Joint. Semin Orthod 2012; 18:73-91.
26. Ueda HM, Ishizuka Y, Miyamoto K, Morimoto N. Relationship between masticatory muscle activity and vertical craniofacial morphology. Angle Orthod 1998; 68 (3):233-8.
27. Pinto LP, Wolford LM et Al. Maxillomandibular counterclockwise rotation and mandibular advancement with TMJ Concepts total joint prostheses Part III – Pain and dysfunction outcomes. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
2009; 38: 326-31.
28. Girardot RA. Comparison of Condylar Pos i t ion in Hype rdive rgent and Hypodivergent Facial Skeletal Types. Angle Orthod 2001; 71:240-6.
29. Tamaki K, Ikeda T, Wake H, Toyoda M. An assessment of condilar dynamics associated with grinding movements. Part 1: Pattern analysis of condilar dynamics. Prosthodont Res Pract 2007 6:28-33.
30. Gidarakou I et Al. Comparison of Skeletal and Dental Morphology in Asymptomatic Volunteers and Symptomatic Patients with Normal Temporomandibular Joints. Angle Orthod 2003;73:116-20.
31.SonnesenL ,SvenssonP. Temporomandibular disorders and psychological status in adult patients with a deep bite. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30(6): 621-9.
32. Pahkala R, Qvarns t rom M. Can Temporomandibular dysfuntion signs be predicted by early morphological or funtional variables? Eur J Orthod 2004; 26 (4):367-73.
33. Nebbe B, Major PW. Prevalence of TMJ Disc Displacement in a Pre-Orthodontic Adolescent Sample. Angle Orthod 2000; 70 (6):454-63.
34. Eric L. Schiffman, Edmond L. Truelove, Richard Ohrbach, Gary C. Anderson, Mike T. John. The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. I: Overview and Methodology for Assessment of Validity, Journal of Orofacial Pain, 2010; 24(1).
35. Hee-Seok Roh, Wook Kim, Young-Ku Kim, Jeong-Yun Lee. Relationships between disk displacement, joint effusion, and degenerative changes of the TMJ in TMD patients based on MRI findings. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 2012; 40:283-6.
36. Baumrind S. The Road to Three- Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Semin Orthod 2011; 17:2-12.
37. Molen A. Comparing Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems from an Orthodontic Perspective. Semin Orthod 2011; 17:34-8.
38. Kang Bet al. The Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Pathology, Developmental Anomalies and Traumatic Injuries Relevant to Orthodontics. Semin Orthod 2011;17: 20-33.
39. Baumrind S. The Road to Three- Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Semin Orthod 2011; 17:2-12.
40. Mah J, Yi L, Reyes H, HyeRan C. Advanced Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Semin Orthod 2011; 17:57-71.
41. Kasumi I, Kawamura A. Assessment of optimal condylar position with limited cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135 (4): 495-501.
42. Oana BH et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: Comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
2007;132:42938.
43. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GRJ. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009; 38:609-25.
44. Ahmad Abdelkarim. Myths and facts of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists 2012; 1:3-8.
Revista Estomatológica 1996 6:1-72.
2. Friedman M H, Weisberg J. Application of Orthopedic Principles in Evaluation of the Temporomandibular Joint. 1982; 62 (5):597-603.
3. Hidaka O, Adachi S, Takada K. The Difference in Condylar Position Between Centric Relation and Centric Occlusion in Pretreatment Japanese Orthodontic Patients. Angle Orthod 2002;72: 295–301.
4. Friedman MH, Weisberg J. Application of Orthopedic Principles in Evaluation of the Temporomandibular Joint. J. Physic Therapy. 1982; 62:59.
5. Possult U: Physiology of Occlusion and Rehabilitation. Oxford, England, Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1969: 12.
6. Wang L, Lazebnik M, Detamore S. Hyaline cartilage cells outperform mandibular condylar cartilage cells in a TMJ fibrocartilage tissue engineering application. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2009; 17:346-53.
7. McNamara J, Seligman D, Okeson J. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment and Temporomandibular Disorders: A
review. J Orofacial Pain 1995; 9:73-90.
8. Watted N, Witt E, Kenn W. The temporomandibular joint and the disck condyle relationship after functional orthopaedic treatment: a magnetic resonance imaging study Eur J Orthod 2001; 23(6):683-93.
9. Rinchuse D, Kandasamy S. Articulators in orthodontics: An evidence-based perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129:299-308.
10. Tsuruta A et Al. The relationship between morphological changes of the condyle and condilar position in the glenoid fossa. J Orofacial Pain 2004; 18:148-55.
11. Hickman D, Cramer R. The effect of different condylar positions on masticatory muscle electromyographic activity in humans. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85:18-23.
12. Kozlowski J. Honing Damon System Mechanics for the Ultimate in Efficiency and Excellence. Clinical Impressions. 2008; 16(1):23-8.
13. Thomas, B. Comunicación personal. Damon System certified education Staff.Poway CA Septiembre 26 de 2008.
14. Rodríguez A, Castaño AM, Puerta E. Variación en la posición condilar con el uso de Bite Turbos®. Estudio piloto. [Tesis Especialización] Universidad del Valle, Escuela de Odontología; 2011.
15. Iscan Hakan N, Sarisoy Lale. Comparison of the effects of passive posterior biteblocks with different construction bites on the craniofacial and dentoalveolar structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112:171-8.
16. Michelotti A, Iodice G. The role of orthodontics in temporomandibular disorders. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2010; 37:411-29.
17. Conti A et al. Relationship Between Signs and Symptoms of Temporomandibular Disorders and Orthodontic Treatment: A Cross-sectional Study. Angle Orthod 2003; 73:411-7.
18. Karl P, Foley T. The use of a deprogramming appliance to obtain centric relation records. Angle Orthod 1999; 69 (2):117-25.
19. Llombart D, Llombart JA. Aplicaciones del análisis estructural al estudio de las interferencias oclusales. Revista internacional de métodos numéricos, 1996; 12(4):497-513.
20. Klar N, Kulbersh R, Freeland T, Kaczynski R. Maximum Intercuspation-Centric Relation Disharmony in 200 Consecutively Finished Cases in a Gnathologlcally Oriented Practice. Semin Orthod 2003; 9: 109-16.
21. Massaiu G, Vargiu A, Lorenzini V. Un nuovo approccio in terapia gnatologica. La terapia mediante byte invisible. Il Corriere Ortodontico 2010; 4:31-45.
22. Rinchuse D, Kandasamy S. Myths of orthodontic gnathology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:322-30.
23. Roth RH. Functional Occlusion for the Orthodontist PART 1. J Clin Orthod 1981; (1):32-51.
24. Murray G. The Lateral Pterygoid Muscle. Semin Orthod. 2012; 18:44-50.
25. Koul R. Orthodontic Implications of Growth and Differently Enabled Mandibul a r Movement s for the Temporomandibular Joint. Semin Orthod 2012; 18:73-91.
26. Ueda HM, Ishizuka Y, Miyamoto K, Morimoto N. Relationship between masticatory muscle activity and vertical craniofacial morphology. Angle Orthod 1998; 68 (3):233-8.
27. Pinto LP, Wolford LM et Al. Maxillomandibular counterclockwise rotation and mandibular advancement with TMJ Concepts total joint prostheses Part III – Pain and dysfunction outcomes. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
2009; 38: 326-31.
28. Girardot RA. Comparison of Condylar Pos i t ion in Hype rdive rgent and Hypodivergent Facial Skeletal Types. Angle Orthod 2001; 71:240-6.
29. Tamaki K, Ikeda T, Wake H, Toyoda M. An assessment of condilar dynamics associated with grinding movements. Part 1: Pattern analysis of condilar dynamics. Prosthodont Res Pract 2007 6:28-33.
30. Gidarakou I et Al. Comparison of Skeletal and Dental Morphology in Asymptomatic Volunteers and Symptomatic Patients with Normal Temporomandibular Joints. Angle Orthod 2003;73:116-20.
31.SonnesenL ,SvenssonP. Temporomandibular disorders and psychological status in adult patients with a deep bite. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30(6): 621-9.
32. Pahkala R, Qvarns t rom M. Can Temporomandibular dysfuntion signs be predicted by early morphological or funtional variables? Eur J Orthod 2004; 26 (4):367-73.
33. Nebbe B, Major PW. Prevalence of TMJ Disc Displacement in a Pre-Orthodontic Adolescent Sample. Angle Orthod 2000; 70 (6):454-63.
34. Eric L. Schiffman, Edmond L. Truelove, Richard Ohrbach, Gary C. Anderson, Mike T. John. The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. I: Overview and Methodology for Assessment of Validity, Journal of Orofacial Pain, 2010; 24(1).
35. Hee-Seok Roh, Wook Kim, Young-Ku Kim, Jeong-Yun Lee. Relationships between disk displacement, joint effusion, and degenerative changes of the TMJ in TMD patients based on MRI findings. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 2012; 40:283-6.
36. Baumrind S. The Road to Three- Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Semin Orthod 2011; 17:2-12.
37. Molen A. Comparing Cone Beam Computed Tomography Systems from an Orthodontic Perspective. Semin Orthod 2011; 17:34-8.
38. Kang Bet al. The Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Pathology, Developmental Anomalies and Traumatic Injuries Relevant to Orthodontics. Semin Orthod 2011;17: 20-33.
39. Baumrind S. The Road to Three- Dimensional Imaging in Orthodontics. Semin Orthod 2011; 17:2-12.
40. Mah J, Yi L, Reyes H, HyeRan C. Advanced Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics. Semin Orthod 2011; 17:57-71.
41. Kasumi I, Kawamura A. Assessment of optimal condylar position with limited cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135 (4): 495-501.
42. Oana BH et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: Comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
2007;132:42938.
43. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GRJ. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009; 38:609-25.
44. Ahmad Abdelkarim. Myths and facts of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists 2012; 1:3-8.
- Juán José Castillo, Santiago Herrera, Pablo Andrés Rey, Carlos Mejía Pavony, Adriana Jaramillo, Comparison of tensile properties of thermo cured acrylic resins for the preparation of denture bases , Revista Estomatología: Vol. 19 No. 1 (2011)
Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.